Thursday 10 April 2014

Pluviophilia, obscurity and insignificance

Fair warning, this post is for more melodramatic than I thought it would be. If I'm being honest, I don't even know why I'm writing this post in the first place. It rained last night, and Bangalore is looking far more exquisite than I expected her to look. Sitting here, with a warm cup of coffee in my hand and mellow music flowing into the crevices of my soul, I feel complete, whole. I feel alive in a way that's rare and special.

I can't seem to get a story out of my mind, though.

Jason Webley wrote about a new show he's going to perform named Margaret. If you're not too busy, you should read the blog post. Its about a woman named Margaret Rucker, whose scrap book was found by Jason's friend in a San Francisco dumpster. That scrap book held her life. Pictures, poems, stories, everything. Imagine the vastness of your life, the sheer size of it, all resting pretty between the hard covers of a book. Every single thought you dreamed up, every idea you breathed life into, every memory you carved into your heart - everything - snug between two pieces of cardboard.

Imagine every achievement you hold dear, every relationship you shared, every little souvenir from your life ending up in a dumpster twenty years after your passing. How unbelievably sad is that? There will come a time no one will remember. Everyone who ever knew you would be dead. Your name will be nothing but an arrangement of letter on genealogy websites.

 Maybe we, as a generation, will have a greater impact. We have so many avenues to express ourselves. On the internet alone we have facebooks and twitters and tumblrs. We have our blog posts and the comment section of most websites. Our activities will decline, our pages will remain stagnant. But we'll leave a mark. I think of Margaret Rucker, whose whole life was left in a dumpster, to be broken, crushed and purged. She exists now in this ever-changing world because of one man's curiosity. Like the subjects of the thousands of old portraits, photographs and daguerreotypes she exists in the things that hold her image. Things that almost got destroyed.

Obscurity and insignificance are terrifying. Whenever I see those old photographs of places and things, seared with the silhouettes of various unknown souls, I always wonder what happened to them. I love old photographs, but they make me so sad. There are millions of stories a hand's reach away from me, but they were lost somewhere over the dunes of time and I can never ever touch them. So many souls, lost in the seas of obscurity. Who remembers them? who thinks about them? Who talks of them? There must be millions of Margaret Ruckers by now, but most are lost to us, never to be brought back.

Even years after watching Cheers, I still think about the opening credits. I keep wondering who those people were, what were they like. Were they happy? Did they go to the pub to drink their troubles away? How long did they live? When did they die?

The boys in this particular picture still make me wonder. Did they ever really grow up, or did they breathe their last wearing those smug grins on their faces? Did they live comfortable lives and die of old age or were they lost during the World Wars? We remember Glenn Miller. Who remembers them? If a man didn't come up with the idea of using old archive photos for the opening credits of a show, would we have ever seen these boys?

Do you ever think that maybe obscurity is inevitable?  I mean, who remember's Oscar Wilde's neighbor from two doors down? Is technology advanced enough to save us from being forgotten like all those Margaret Ruckers have been? If a wealthy woman from an influetial family ended up in the dumpster, what hope is there for us all?

-Bewildered

Thursday 3 April 2014

life v/s The Life

When it comes to life itself, I don't suppose I'm the only one who has two distinct ideas of living. There's life of course, the everyday grind. the push-pulls of public transport, the joys of passive smoking, the honking cars and nosy neighbors. That's life. Then of course, there's The Life - and yes, the capitalization is necessary. This is The Life with its weekly massages, cruising around the Italian riviera in Lamborghinis. The joys of caviar (or whatever you like), the minions, the decadence. C'est la vie.

Now you may call The Life whatever you like. I assume the cynics among you would call it futile day-dreaming, or just pipe dreams. The more, shall I say, supercilious members of the populace might prefer using pompous phrases such as "it's only a matter of time". Irrespective of what you call it, you have to admit that there is a very clear distinction between life and Life. This difference is possibly the most visible when life attempts to achieve the goals of Life. How so? Well, aren't you the most aware of the fact that Life is an idealization the moment you begin to live it? You think "this can't be real" or "this is perfect". Your disbelief is what seals the deal. That's what makes The Life a living, breathing entity. Don't deny it - no matter what you consider The Life to be (Ross Noble probably considers tossing ewoks into lakes of liquefied Methane the High Life. Admitted, his might be a little more out of reach than most ideas of Life) the truth is, you have one.

Now lets get on with the real thing, shall we?

One of the first things that confuses me is how to visualize the Life alongside life. Having spent most of the last six years drawing graphs,  the X-Y coordinates seemed the easiest thing to work with. Initially, I imagined Life to be a steady, constant thing (graphs 1 and 2), but the truth of the matter is, things change. As life gets further, our dreams get dimmer. The star studded Life soon becomes a haunt for fireflies. Realism doesn't just affect us - more often than not, it affects our idea of things. When I was ten, I wanted to be rich enough to own a Caribbean island. By 13, a huge yacht and a Scottish castle seemed more than enough. 16 brought dreams of an apartment on the Upper West Side and at 22, the only thing I really want is a moderately comfortable life and the company of interesting people. My idea of the Life has gone from an episode of World's Richest People to basically a combination of rain, coffee and good friends. I'm not complaining - my current idea of The Life is far more compatible with who I am and is far more achievable a dream than become Johnny Depp's next door neighbor (ref. graphs 3, 4).

Another fact to keep in mind is, you can't actually plot lives on a graph. Mostly because you won't know what to put on the X-axis. I dramatically put "everything" s the label for X axis, and maybe, superficially it makes sense. The level of awesomeness of your life depends on everything. Starting with the kind of income brackets your parents fall under to that extra slice of cheesecake you ate last Friday, everything matters. Everything has an impact. Despite the sheer stupidity of considering "everything", lets address the real deal here: Is it accurate to assume that the things that impact our lives also impact our Lives? I think so. I mean if you were born richer or poorer, your Life would be different. If you found fell frightfully ill after the cheesecake, I imagine you would rid your Life of cheesecake almost immediately.


So basically, two long-winding paragraphs later, we can conclude that life and Life are basically players of the same sport. While one is a legend you hear whispers about, the other looks up to the legend, trying all it can to be like his hero. They are, however distinct entities that are constantly changing and evolving, which brings me to the best part of the idea: while life may be the kid trying to emulate his hero, Life is the one who changes as per the decisions made by the other. You can't predict exactly which direction life takes, but Life will always be a function of your past, present and perceived future. Its also a function of the dreams you have, and the dreams you lost. It abides by the laws that you live by. It reflects your sense of morality. In simple terms, the Life is a function of you:


Life = f(you)


Which manages to be an idea both terrifying and exhilarating. Think of all the times you spend cursing the fact that your life isn't going the way you want it to go (i.e. The Lifestyle), when the fact is, your actual life is a bitch to a whole lot of things apart from you while Life can be molded by you in anyway you see fit. You can influence everything in your Life, not life. The idealized version that you dream of can be twisted into whatever you desire.

Your actual life, on the other hand? Not actually in your hands.

Wednesday 12 February 2014

The Square Pegs

A snippet from a conversation

 Bemused:  well okay. Do you feel pigeon holed by friends sometimes?
 Bewildered in what sense?
Elaborate
 Bemused:  sometimes, when I’m around certain people, I feel like I’m being compartmentalized, and I find myself believing that I’m just their perception of me,  although I know that's not true.
i mean. Is that normal
 Bewildered:  you feel like your dimensions are reduced to maybe two sides
 Bemused:  yes
 Bewildered:  sometimes even one
yep
 Bemused:  yeah, even though I am aware that I’m more, I feel restricted to fewer
argh
 Bewildered:  that's 90% of your acquaintances
 Bemused:  so infuriating
Yeah, but I get that happening with acquaintances. I dunno if it's supposed to happen with friends
 Bewildered:  like fitting a square peg in a round hole
it will
 Bemused:  exactly!
 Bewildered:  of course you will
Did you honestly expect that every friend of yours will see you 100% as who you are?
honey you're dreaming up utopia again
 Bemused:  no, they needn't see me as exactly who I am. Even I can't do that yet.
 Bewildered:  every human being comes with a very long and detailed thesis
 Bemused:  it's like this. With some people, although i know they only get about 5% of me, I still don't feel pigeonholed
 Bewildered:  about who what and why they are, doesn't mean everyone's interested in reading it
 Bemused:  yeah that's true
 Bewildered:  face it, our theses appeal to a very small portion of our friends
and that's how you know who's a keeper I guess
people who don't just care for you but are interested in you
the you- ness of you

 Bemused:  yeah, you're right
gah
<3
pretty heart for you
 Bewildered:  that's an ugly fucking heart

I’m returning it

Love Actually

Bewildered:
I was recently listening to a playlist on 8tracks dedicated to one of my favorite characters, Sirius Black. One of the songs used struck a chord with me, I guess. Suddenly I felt this sense of overwhelming sadness, of sympathy, the cooing, motherly "my poor baby" kind.

And now I wonder, why is it so easy to get attached to fictional characters. In a world where we find it so easy to intentionally hurt people, how do we manage to adopt fictional entities born of a stranger's mind? Moreover, why do we associate so many feelings and emotions to non-existent entities. What makes us fall in love with characters so easily when we are terrified of falling in love with reality?